MIT may be inventing future technology, but it’s up to us to decide how we use it

Once again I’m indebted to the print edition of Wired UK for news of a couple of things which will be a real boon to people in the world of marketing.
The November issue (sorry, no link as its content isn’t online to avoid cannibalizing sales of the print edition) is entirely devoted to the work of the MIT Media Lab, which the cover headline rather grandly describes as “inventing the future”. Hyperbole aside, it’s come up with some cool stuff over the years — from e-ink (think Kindle) and Lego Mindstorms to the XO Laptop.
Among the latest things its team of world-leading researchers have developed are two pieces of technology of particular interest to marketers.
The first, Video Response codes, are basically like the QR codes we’ve seen in print for a number of years, but are instead embedded invisibly in video displayed on screens.
The idea is that you use your smartphone to take a photo of the screen and the software grabs the VR code, decodes it and links you to text, images, coupons, whatever, to be downloaded to your phone. Presumably, as the codes are imperceptible to anyone watching the screen, the video will have to have some kind of ‘snap this for cool stuff’ message included so you know there’s a VR code there to be captured.
Straight off the top of my head I can imagine this being used to create interactive cinema and TV adverts (QR codes have already been tried on TV, but there’s been a mixed reaction to them from consumers for various reasons). Or embedded in YouTube videos to link to other Web-based content.
As with so many technologies, their use is limited only by your imagination.
The second technology is Affdex. Originally developed in the Media Lab, it’s been spun off into its own company, Affectiva.
Put simply, the software tells you what the emotional state is of the person your camera is looking at by measuring key parameters on their face.
The original algorithm was built on autism research to help sufferers read the emotions of other people, It was first used to create “Mindreader” spectacles which told the wearer, via a tiny LCD screen, whether the person in front of them was happy, sad or whatever.
Rosalind Picard and her team took it further by training it recognize the emotions of more people from around the world by showing it videos. The goal — so a computer could recognize their emotional states.
It’s now so successful that marketing research giant Millward Brown has partnered with Affectiva to use it to get accurate real-time feedback from consumers and research subjects on TV adverts. The result is more accurate data where subjects may feel socially constrained from saying how they feel — not everyone’s comfortable telling someone their ad sucks.
But, as with almost any technology, the other possible uses are huge. Imagine having it for when you Skype a key journalist about whether they’re going to use a story you’ve pitched (think lie detector!) or are following up a business pitch with a potential customer (are they really as interested as they say?)
Unsurprisingly, pollsters are already excited about Affdex’s potential for more accurately judging voters’ reactions to candidates’ TV ads and debates. And the US National Security Agency has already expressed interest in using it for obvious reasons, although Affectiva aren’t keen to licence it for military use.
As much as we may legitimately want to know what others really feel in certain work circumstances, we also sometimes want to keep our own emotions private.
The article quotes other possible uses including allowing Facebook or YouTube to read your emotion (via your laptop webcam) as you watch a video (e.g. of a friend’s baby) and post your reaction online automatically. But what if you’re secretly jealous of your friend’s joyful event but don’t want to upset her? What if you don’t really think your friend’s new outfit is lovely?
Do you really want Facebook and YouTube, or your government if you live in a repressive country, to know how you truly feel about certain articles or videos online?
Clearly this technology has great potential for ethical uses, but given its claimed ability to get behind social barriers in the communication of feelings it has to be used within a strict set of opt-in guidelines and licenced carefully.
MIT may be inventing technologies of the future, but it’s up to us to decide how they’re used.